Writing for Success: The Argument
Despite differences between governments, geography and infrastructure, the program has not been as successful as it could have been. Sub-Saharan Africa has neither the money nor the infrastructure to support such a complex program and it could not have been implemented as intended. Most African countries do not have the resources to send all their people to doctors and be vaccinated, nor do they have the means to clear wetlands or other malaria-prone areas…
The continent’s per capita expenditure on malaria eradication is only a quarter of Brazil. Sub-Saharan African countries simply cannot rely on a plan that requires more money, infrastructure and expertise than they do.
Example of argumentative essay 2
There are many medications available to treat malaria, and many of them work well and save lives, but malaria eradication programs that focus too much on prevention have not had long-term success in sub-Saharan Africa. A key malaria control program is the Global Malaria Eradication Program. Founded in 1955, it aimed to eradicate malaria in Africa within the next ten years…
The number of people in sub-Saharan Africa who contracted malaria, as well as the number of deaths from malaria, actually increased by more than 10% during the program. Malaria is an infectious disease caused by parasites that are transmitted to humans through the female Anopheles mosquito. More than half a billion people are infected with malaria each year, about 80% of them living in sub-Saharan Africa. Nearly half a million people die from malaria each year, most of them young children under the age of five..
Building on previously successful programs in Brazil and the United States, the program focused primarily on controlling the disease vector. This included the widespread distribution of chloroquine and the spraying of large amounts of DDT. More than $ 1 billion has been spent fighting malaria. However, the program suffered from many problems and in 1969 the WHO was forced to admit that the program had failed to eradicate malaria….
While replacing libraries with tablets may seem like a simple solution, it will encourage people to spend even more time looking at digital screens, despite the many challenges that surround them. It will also stop access to many of the library benefits on which people relied…
In many areas, libraries are such an important part of the community network that they cannot be replaced by a simple object. However, replacing libraries with tablets would be a serious mistake. First, digital books and resources are associated with less training and more problems than print resources. Research conducted on tablets and books found that people read 20-30% slower on tablets, hold 20% less information and understand 10% less of what they read, compared to people who read it. the same information in hard copy. In addition, looking at a screen for a long time has been shown to cause many health problems, including blurred vision, dizziness, dry eyes, headaches, and eye strain, much more often than reading printed images. People who use excessive tablets and mobile devices are also more likely to have more serious health problems such as fibromyalgia, shoulder and back pain, carpal tunnel syndrome and muscle cramps. I know that every time I read an e-book for a long time, my eyes start to get tired and my neck hurts..
Unlike many other infectious diseases, the number of deaths from malaria is increasing. Some of the comments made are not completely accurate, especially since e-books are cheaper. In fact, renting a large number of digital copies of a book costs the library more than buying a physical copy. Make sure that in your essay, you thoroughly examine each of the arguments and objections you make, otherwise you will look like you do not know very well about the problem. This is a shorter document and if it needs to be expanded to meet size requirements, it can include more examples and go into more detail, such as explaining specific cases where people have benefited from local libraries….